Ki Tisa, 5772/2012 thoughts: Questions & quotes
You can read the basics of Parshat Ki Tisa (Exodus 30:11–34:35) here.
Some questions of mine
- HaShem took the Israelite slaves out of a land rife with the worship of humans (the Pharoah), animals (such as cats), and idols of both of the aforementioned. So why was HaShem surprised when the ex-slaves, panicking at the absence of their leader, Moshe/Moses, built and worshiped a golden calf? Shouldn't HaShem have seen this coming? And why did HaShem keep Moshe on the mountain for long enough to make the people panic?
- What kind of a G-d-and-Moses cult did HaShem create, that it never occurred to the Israelites to appoint Aharon/Aaron as their temporary leader?
- Aharon's excuse for building the golden calf (Exodus 32:22-23) is laughable. (It would have made more sense if he'd said that he was afraid the people would kill him if he didn't make an idol for them.) Why was he not taken to task by either Moshe or HaShem?
- Why, in the Torah/Bible, do our ancestors get lauded and/or rewarded for wholesale slaughter? Was it really necessary for the tribe of Levi to kill thousands? (For that matter, was it really necessary for Esther to ask for permission to slaughter the enemies of the Jews for a second day?)
- Am I the only one who finds it most interesting that, almost immediately after the Israelites have been punished for worshiping a golden calf, Moshe asks to see G-d's glory?
- Exodus, chapter 31, quoted in the Maariv/Evening Service, Shacharit/Morning Service , and the Kiddush (sanctification of the holy day over wine or grape juice) of Shabbat/Sabbath:
- Exodus, chapter 34, quoted at least in part in the services on Shalosh Regalim/Pilgrimage Festivals and Yamim Noraim/High Holidays:
- Exodus, chapter 34, part of verse 9, quoted in the prayers on the Yamim Noraim:
וְסָלַחְתָּ לַעֲוֹנֵנוּ וּלְחַטָּאתֵנוּ וּנְחַלְתָּנוּ.
and pardon our iniquity and our sin, and take us for Thine inheritance.'
- Exodus, chapter 32, part of verse 12, a quote that appears in the "Long Tachanun" (recited on non-holiday Monday and Thursday mornings only) that's so obscure that neither the Birnbaum nor the Koren-Sacks siddur/prayer book cites it, but the ArtScroll siddur does:
שׁוּב מֵחֲרוֹן אַפֶּךָ, וְהִנָּחֵם עַל-הָרָעָה לְעַמֶּךָ.
Turn from Thy fierce wrath, and repent of this evil against Thy people."
(For more fun from my "quote-hunter" series, start here, and follow the link.)
See also my previous posts:
- What I learned from Parshat Ki Tisa (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)
- Parshat Ki Tisa, Thursday, February 17, 2011
- And one of my favorites, "My kingdom for a dry cleaner," or Mrs. Cohen's complaint (Tuesday, February 26, 2008)
4 Comments:
"Why, in the Torah/Bible, do our ancestors get lauded and/or rewarded for wholesale slaughter? Was it really necessary for the tribe of Levi to kill thousands? (For that matter, was it really necessary for Esther to ask for permission to slaughter the enemies of the Jews for a second day?)"
Because the world is a nasty, brutal place. At the time of the Bible, we weren't the losers that we'd been for the 1900 years between the fall of the Temple and the birth of Israel.
Seriously, we defeated our enemies, punishes transgressors, and went from a small nomadic tribe in the Egyptian dessert (using lack of archeological evidence, Rabbinic and Midrashic size estimates aside) into a semi-powerhouse that defeated the Canaanite tribes.
Later, through several turns of vassalage, we turned into the wimpy, scared of our enemies, Woody Alan caricature that you've come to know and love.
Okay, so I prefer the sweetness-and-light version. Guilty as charged. :)
Sorry, but all this slaughter still gives me the creeps, and the fact that regular folks were slain but Aharon was not punished doesn't help. The question is, was this bloodletting necessary to ensure our people's survival? I'm not convinced.
Semi-regularly bloodletting of men is part of how a polygamous society keeps things under control. The bloodletting can be against one's enemies via war, or internal via rebellion and civil war, but either way, the blood letting is pretty par for the course.
OTOH, there is then no Shidduch crisis.
"Semi-regularly bloodletting of men is part of how a polygamous society keeps things under control."
Oy. You're probably right.
"OTOH, there is then no Shidduch crisis."
That may be the only advantage to polygamy. On the other hand, in a polygamous society, a woman *really* has to be willing to share.
Post a Comment
<< Home